Thursday, 25 October 2007
Thursday, 18 October 2007
Monday, 15 October 2007
What kind of reader are you?
What Kind of Reader Are You? Your Result: Obsessive-Compulsive Bookworm You're probably in the final stages of a Ph.D. or otherwise finding a way to make your living out of reading. You are one of the literati. Other people's grammatical mistakes make you insane. | |
Dedicated Reader | |
Literate Good Citizen | |
Book Snob | |
Non-Reader | |
Fad Reader | |
What Kind of Reader Are You? Create Your Own Quiz |
Thursday, 11 October 2007
Outline
An introduction to and outline of my ethics course this term.
We will use close readings of three classic texts to investigate some central issues in moral philosophy, including whether it’s rational to be moral, the nature and source of morality, disputes between consequentialists and deontologists, and what it is for someone’s life to go well. Our project is to engage with the attempts of three very different geniuses to answer an obvious, pressing, difficult question: how should one live?
BOOKS
Our texts are:
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (1651)
Immanuel Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785)
John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism (1861)
LECTURE PLAN
1 - Introduction
2 - Overview of Leviathan; Human nature & human action (Leviathan introduction & chapters i-xi)
3 - The state of nature (Leviathan chapters xii-xiii)
4 - Artificial morality (Leviathan chapters xiv-xxi)
5 - Kant vs Hobbes; Overview of Groundwork; The categorical imperative (Groundwork preface & chapter 1)
6 - The laws of freedom (Groundwork chapters 2 & 3)
7 - Mill vs Kant; Mill vs Hobbes; Overview of Utilitarianism; Welfare (Utilitarianism chapters 1 & 2)
8 - Rational action & self-development (Utilitarianism chapters 3 & 4)
9 - Kinds of utilitarianism; Justice, integrity, & rights (Utilitarianism chapter 5)
We can only learn to philosophize, that is, to exercise the talent of reason, in accordance with its universal principles, on certain actually existing attempts at philosophy, always, however, reserving the right of reason to investigate, to confirm, or to reject these principles in their very sources. – Immanuel KantOVERVIEW
One pretty good definition of college is that it’s a place where people are made to read difficult books. – Jonathan Franzen
We will use close readings of three classic texts to investigate some central issues in moral philosophy, including whether it’s rational to be moral, the nature and source of morality, disputes between consequentialists and deontologists, and what it is for someone’s life to go well. Our project is to engage with the attempts of three very different geniuses to answer an obvious, pressing, difficult question: how should one live?
BOOKS
Our texts are:
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (1651)
Immanuel Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785)
John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism (1861)
LECTURE PLAN
1 - Introduction
2 - Overview of Leviathan; Human nature & human action (Leviathan introduction & chapters i-xi)
3 - The state of nature (Leviathan chapters xii-xiii)
4 - Artificial morality (Leviathan chapters xiv-xxi)
5 - Kant vs Hobbes; Overview of Groundwork; The categorical imperative (Groundwork preface & chapter 1)
6 - The laws of freedom (Groundwork chapters 2 & 3)
7 - Mill vs Kant; Mill vs Hobbes; Overview of Utilitarianism; Welfare (Utilitarianism chapters 1 & 2)
8 - Rational action & self-development (Utilitarianism chapters 3 & 4)
9 - Kinds of utilitarianism; Justice, integrity, & rights (Utilitarianism chapter 5)
Wednesday, 10 October 2007
First post
I plan to use this blog to make some of the work I do as an academic philosopher - giving lectures, writing about books, etc. - more widely available. Partly out of vanity, but also out of the belief that since I'm employed as a public servant to do this work, the public should be able to access it. Hi, public.
Initially, I'll be posting notes on this term's teaching on ethics (aka moral philosophy); when I work out how, I'll add audio files of the lectures. Questions, objections, suggestions for improvements are all welcome in comments.
Initially, I'll be posting notes on this term's teaching on ethics (aka moral philosophy); when I work out how, I'll add audio files of the lectures. Questions, objections, suggestions for improvements are all welcome in comments.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)